Kanehl v. Capital Management Services LP
| Marlene Kanehl |
| Capital Management Services LP |
| 2:2019cv01381 |
| September 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Based on the Notice of Dismissal, this case is terminated pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with prejudice and without costs to either party. (mlm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Marlene Kanehl. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Marlene Kanehl. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 9/24/2019. The plaintiff's motion to stay further proceedings #3 is granted. The parties are relieved from the automatic briefing schedule set forth in Civil Local Rule 7(b) and (c). Moreover, for administrative purposes, it is necessary that the Clerk terminate the plaintiff's motion for class certification. However, this motion will be regarded as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011). Motion terminated. (cc: all counsel) (mlm)
|
| Summons Issued as to Capital Management Services LP. (mlm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Marlene Kanehl. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Marlene Kanehl. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Capital Management Services LP by Marlene Kanehl. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3224287) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: billing statement, #2 Exhibit B: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kanehl v. Capital Management Services LP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlene Kanehl | |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital Management Services LP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
