Jackson v. Scifres
Ramon Jackson |
Jonathan Scifres |
2:2019cv01516 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 12/6/2019. Rule 26(a) Disclosures to be exchanged by 12/23/2019; Amended Pleadings due by 2/3/2020; Plaintiff's Expert Witness List due by 6/30/2020; Defendant's Expert Witness List due by 9/28/2020; Rebuttal expert witness lists due by 11/30/2020; Discovery due by 11/30/2020; Dispositive Motions or joint status report due by 12/30/2020, response and reply deadlines mandated by Civil L.R. 56 apply to dispositive motions. Any party filing proposed findings of fact shall email Word version of proposed findings to PepperPO@wied.uscourts.gov. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Plan by Jonathan Scifres. (Zellner, Kiley) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/12/2019. Rule 26 Discovery Plan due by 12/3/2019. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel C Hall, Jr on behalf of Jonathan Scifres. Attorney(s) appearing: Samuel C. Hall, Jr. (Hall, Samuel) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Jonathan Scifres.(Zellner, Kiley) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kiley B Zellner on behalf of Jonathan Scifres. Attorney(s) appearing: Kiley B. Zellner (Zellner, Kiley) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Ramon Jackson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (DeCaro, Dennis) |
Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge William E Duffin no longer assigned to the case due to non-consent. (lz) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Ramon Jackson. (DeCaro, Dennis) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Summons Issued as to Jonathan Scifres. (lz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Jonathan Scifres by Ramon Jackson. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3249167) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(DeCaro, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. Scifres | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jonathan Scifres | |
Represented By: | Samuel C Hall, Jr |
Represented By: | Kiley B Zellner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ramon Jackson | |
Represented By: | Dennis John DeCaro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.