Davis et al v. Milwaukee Police Department et al
| Minor Daughter and Tari Davis |
| The City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Police Department and City of Milwaukee Police Officers |
| 2:2019cv01523 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 BRIEF in Support filed by The City of Milwaukee re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Party Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Defendant City of Milwaukee . (Lappen, Susan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Party Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Defendant City of Milwaukee by The City of Milwaukee. (Lappen, Susan) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by The City of Milwaukee. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Lappen, Susan) |
| Case reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph no longer assigned to the case. (asc) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of Milwaukee Police Officers, The City of Milwaukee filed by Tari Davis.(Strouse, Paul) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF in Support filed by The City of Milwaukee re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Party Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss of Defendant City of Milwaukee . (Lappen, Susan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Party Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss of Defendant City of Milwaukee by The City of Milwaukee. (Lappen, Susan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan E Lappen on behalf of The City of Milwaukee. Attorney(s) appearing: Susan E. Lappen (Lappen, Susan) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to DEFENDANT; The City of Milwaukee requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (asc) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tari Davis. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Strouse, Paul) |
| SECOND NOTICE from the clerk to PLAINTIFF requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed no later than 11/22/2019; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov (asc) |
| Summons Issued as to City of Milwaukee Police Officers, The City of Milwaukee. (asc) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: The attached summons is blank - in the future please remember to submit completed summons. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (asc) |
| FILING FEE Received: $400.00, receipt number MK4689079981. (ds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Tari Davis, Minor Daughter by Tari Davis, Minor Daughter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Milwaukee Police Department, #3 Summons City of Milwaukee)(Strouse, Paul) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
