Toutant Simpson v. Saul
Plaintiff: Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2019cv01530
Filed: October 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due 2/15/20; Defendant's response due 3/26/20; Plaintiff's reply due 4/10/20. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 10/28/2019. (blr)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/18/19 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Angermeier, Vincent)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson. (Angermeier, Vincent)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson. (Angermeier, Vincent)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit ALJ Denial, #3 Exhibit AC Denial)(Angermeier, Vincent)
October 17, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toutant Simpson v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Lynn Toutant Simpson
Represented By: Vincent R Angermeier
Represented By: Robert C Angermeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Emily Skutch Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?