Zarczynski v. Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc et al
Ann Zarczynski |
Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC and Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc |
2:2019cv01663 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Nancy Joseph |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Ann Zarczynski. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (asc) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Ann Zarczynski. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Ann Zarczynski. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Axiom Acquisition Ventures, LLC, Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc by Ann Zarczynski. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3275297) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons on Tate & Kerlin, #4 Summons on Axiom)(Eldridge, Mark) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 11/12/2019. The plaintiff's motion to stay the motion for class certification #3 and motion for relief from the Local Rules setting an automatic briefing schedule #3 are GRANTED. For administrative purposes, it is necessary that the Clerk terminate the plaintiff's motion for class certification #3 . However, this motion will be regarded as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011). (cc: all counsel) (llc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.