Neibauer v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
| Adam Neibauer |
| Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Dilip K Tannan and Dawn Fofana |
| 2:2019cv01765 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 12/6/2019. On or before 12/30/2019 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $1.06 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Adam Neibauer and Warden at Oshkosh Correctional Institution)(cb)
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Adam Neibauer. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (tlf) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Adam Neibauer re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mac) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Adam Neibauer. (mac) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Adam Neibauer. (mac) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Adam Neibauer. (mac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
