Copeland v. Gorilla Fitness LLC et al
| Brett R. Copeland |
| Margle Media WI LLC, Unincorporated Association of Individuals d/b/a Margle Media and Gorilla Fitness LLC |
| 2:2019cv01766 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Brett R. Copeland. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Galster, Garet) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding Copyright. (via US Mail to Register of Copyrights). (lz) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Brett R. Copeland. (Galster, Garet) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Brett R. Copeland. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3293592) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Galster, Garet) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
