Ballard v. Santander Consumer USA et al
| Charles A Ballard |
| Santander Consumer USA and Timmothy Wennes |
| 2:2019cv01808 |
| December 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Santander Consumer USA - Waiver sent on 1/9/2020. (Croft, Blaec) |
| Filing 5 TRANSMIT Order, Complaint, Notice, Waiver and Consent forms to US Marshal for service upon all defendants. (bx) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/11/19 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. U.S. Marshals Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, a waiver of service form and/or the summons, and this order upon defendants. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff) (jad)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Charles A Ballard. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Charles A Ballard. (bx) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Charles A Ballard. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
