Bartz v. Speedy Cash et al
| Crystal Bartz |
| AD Astra Recovery Services Inc, SCIL, Inc. and Speedy Cash |
| 2:2020cv00245 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Crystal Bartz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Crystal Bartz. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against AD Astra Recovery Services Inc, SCIL, Inc., Speedy Cash by Crystal Bartz. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3363905) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons on Speedy Cash, #5 Summons on SCIL, Inc., #6 Summons Ad Astra)(Eldridge, Mark) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
