Gens v. Zoom Video Communications Inc
| Timothy Gens |
| Zoom Video Communications Inc |
| 2:2020cv00593 |
| April 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Case transferred from Wisconsin Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 4:20-cv-03078, filed 05/05/2020. (bx) |
| Case Terminated (bx) |
| Case Electronically Transmitted to the Northern District of California on 05/04/2020. (jcl) |
Filing 8
Order for Transfer of Venue to US District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 5/1/20. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION for Transfer of Venue by Zoom Video Communications Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kushner, Beth) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE Statement by Zoom Video Communications Inc. (Kushner, Beth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth J Kushner on behalf of Zoom Video Communications Inc. Attorney(s) appearing: Beth J. Kushner (Kushner, Beth) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Timothy Gens. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Gens, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by All Defendants. (Gens, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Timothy Gens (Gens, Timothy) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
| Summons Issued as to Zoom Video Communications Inc. (bx) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: One or more party names have been modified (Do Not Add Addresses)- please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (bx) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Timothy Gens by Timothy Gens. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3419988)(Gens, Timothy) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/13/2020: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ds). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gens v. Zoom Video Communications Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy Gens | |
| Represented By: | Timothy H Gens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zoom Video Communications Inc | |
| Represented By: | Beth J Kushner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
