Shaw v. Kemper et al
2:2020cv00599 |
March 31, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/14/2021: DENYING 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and DENYING as moot 18 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Terrance J Shaw at Racine Correctional Institution)(jm) |
Filing 16 SCREENING ORDER re 1 Plaintiff's Complaint signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 3/31/2021. 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee is DENIED as moot. 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Dire cting Defendants to Reply is DENIED. 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Magistrate Judge Consent is DENIED as moot. CASE DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b) (1) because the complaint fails to state a claim. Clerk of Court to DOCUMENT that this inmate has incurred a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Terrance J Shaw at Racine Correctional Institution)(jm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shaw v. Kemper et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.