Powell v. Konrad et al
Antwon Corderrel Powell |
Lt Vetsch, Corporal Dimmer, Corporal Brock and Chaplain Karen Konrad |
2:2020cv00951 |
June 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Antwon Corderrel Powell. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (mlm) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 6/29/2020, that on or before July 20, 2020 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 31.60 as an initial partial filing fee in this action. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff, Sheriff)(mlm) |
Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (lz) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Antwon Corderrel Powell. (lz) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Antwon Corderrel Powell. (lz) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury filed against All Defendants by Antwon Corderrel Powell. (Filing Fee NOT PAID $400) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits (bookmarked), #2 Envelope)(lz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.