Ciske v. Saul
Plaintiff: Laura Ciske
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2020cv01154
Filed: July 27, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 8/10/2020. (amb)
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/14/2020. (amb)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due November 16, 2020; Defendants response due December 28, 2020; Plaintiffs reply due January 12, 2021. (cc: all counsel) (asc)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 8/4/20. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Judge Lynn Adelman no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (asc)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 7/29/20 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Laura Ciske. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Traver, David)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Laura Ciske. (Traver, David)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Laura Ciske. (Traver, David)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul by Laura Ciske. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Traver, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ciske v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Ciske
Represented By: David F Traver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Emily Skutch Cohn
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?