Eckola v. Clarke et al
Allan Charles Eckola, Jr |
Officer Clarke, Dog Racco and Taylor Clark |
2:2020cv01323 |
August 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Allan Charles Eckola, Jr. (lz) |
|
Filing 7 LETTER from Charles Eckola Jr. following up on his #6 motion to extend the time to file a certified trust account statement. (mlm) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay the Initial Partial Filing Fee by Allan Charles Eckola, Jr. (mlm) |
Filing 5 LETTER from Allan Eckola to correct name of defendant Officer Taylor Clark. (mlm) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Allan Charles Eckola, Jr. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lz) |
Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (mlm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Allan Charles Eckola, Jr. (mlm) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Officer Clarke, Dog Racco by Allan Charles Eckola, Jr. (mlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.