Riedel v. Saul
| Elizabeth F Riedel |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2020cv01361 |
| September 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Nancy Joseph |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on September 21, 2020. (amb)
|
|
Filing 10
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on September 21, 2020. (amb)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Judy Tsui on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Judy Tsui (Tsui, Judy)
|
|
Filing 8
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due December 28, 2020 Defendant's response due February 8, 2021; Plaintiff's reply due February 23, 2021. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/18/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Judge J P Stadtmueller no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/15/2020 GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
|
|
Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Elizabeth F Riedel. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Fleming, Michael)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE Statement by Elizabeth F Riedel. (Fleming, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Elizabeth F Riedel. (Fleming, Michael)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Elizabeth F Riedel (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fleming, Michael)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riedel v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth F Riedel | |
| Represented By: | Michael W Fleming |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Judy Tsui |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
