McCoy v. Esselman et al
| Leila M McCoy |
| Kari Godsill, Kim Esselman, Debra Dillenberg and Appleton Housing Authority |
| 2:2020cv01394 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 TRANSMIT Complaint, Notice, Waiver, Order and Consent/Refusal Form to USM for service upon all Defendants. (kah) |
Filing 5
SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 9/29/2020 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The US Marshals shall serve the Defendants. (cc: all counsel - via US Mail to Plaintiff) (kah)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Leila M McCoy. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to Leila M McCoy re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (mac) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Leila M McCoy. (mac) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Leila M McCoy (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(mac) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
