Pederson v. Credit Management LP
Breanna Pederson |
Credit Management LP |
2:2020cv01417 |
September 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Terminated pursuant to #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (asc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Breanna Pederson. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/11/2020 re #3 Plaintiff's Rule 7(h) Expedited, Non-Dispositive Motion for Class Certification and Relief from Memorandum, Supporting Documents, and Automatic Briefing Requirements. The court GRANTS the plaintiff's motion to stay the class certification motion until an amended motion for class certification is filed. The court further GRANTS the plaintiff's motion asking for relief from the automatic briefing schedule required by the local rules for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The court ORDERS that the plaintiff's motion for class certification is TERMINATED for administrative purposes; the court will regard the motion as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clear Wire Corp. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Summons Issued as to Credit Management LP. (amb) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Fulton Dental / Damasco), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion to certify class until the scheduling conference, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed with the motion (Civil L.R. 7(a), 7(d)) by Breanna Pederson. (Blythin, John) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Breanna Pederson. (Blythin, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Credit Management LP by Breanna Pederson. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3567624) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B: Credit Management website for submitting disputes, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons on Defendant)(Blythin, John) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pederson v. Credit Management LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Breanna Pederson | |
Represented By: | John D Blythin |
Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Credit Management LP | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.