Vazquez v. Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc
| Christina Vazquez |
| Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc doing business as CBCS |
| 2:2020cv01438 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Terminated pursuant to #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (asc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Christina Vazquez. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| SECOND NOTICE from the clerk to Plaintiff requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed no later than October 22, 2020 ; the form is available at the court's web site: www.wied.uscourts.gov. (ds) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 9/18/2020. The plaintiff's motion to stay the motion for class certification #3 and motion for relief from the Local Rules setting an automatic briefing schedule #3 are GRANTED. For administrative purposes, it is necessary that the Clerk terminate the plaintiff's motion for class certification #3 . However, this motion will be regarded as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011). (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
| Summons Issued as to Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc. (ds) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (bx) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Fulton Dental / Damasco), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion to certify class until the scheduling conference, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from the Local Rules setting automatic briefing schedules and requiring briefs and supporting material to be filed with the motion (Civil L.R. 7(a), 7(d)) by Christina Vazquez. (Blythin, John) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Christina Vazquez. (Blythin, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc by Christina Vazquez. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number WIEDC-3571142) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons on Defendant)(Blythin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vazquez v. Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Bureau Collection Services Inc doing business as CBCS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christina Vazquez | |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
