Wetzel v. Saul
| Thomas Richard Wetzel, III |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2020cv01518 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan C Hugo on behalf of Andrew M Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Megan C. Hugo (Hugo, Megan) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 1/21/2021; Defendants response due 3/2/2021; Plaintiffs reply due 3/17/2021. (cc: all counsel) (mac) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served. (mac) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 10/9/2020. (mac) |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on 10/1/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Thomas Richard Wetzel, III. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Angermeier, Vincent) |
| Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (mac) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Thomas Richard Wetzel, III. (Angermeier, Vincent) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Thomas Richard Wetzel, III. (Angermeier, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Thomas Richard Wetzel, III (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit ALJ Denial, #3 Exhibit AC Denial)(Angermeier, Vincent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wetzel v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Richard Wetzel, III | |
| Represented By: | Vincent R Angermeier |
| Represented By: | Robert C Angermeier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Megan C Hugo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
