Whitfield v. Genuine Parts Company
Larry Whitfield |
Genuine Parts Company |
2:2020cv01540 |
October 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Stephen C Dries |
Brett Ludwig |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case reassigned to Judge Brett Ludwig. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Larry Whitfield. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Livingston, Maxwell) |
SECOND NOTICE from the clerk to Plaintiff requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 14 days; the form is available #here. (kah) |
Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: One or more party names have been modified - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. Also, the description of the attachments contains duplicate text. In the future, when attaching documents to the main document you may select a description from the category drop-down list but then you should not repeat that word in the description text box. For example, if you choose Exhibit from the drop-down list, then you may simply type A in the description text box and Exhibit A will appear on the docket. Also, the attached summons was not prepared using the version found on our website (the Clerk of Court needs to be updated) - please follow the instructions and RESUBMIT the summons using the event Request for Issuance of Summons which is found under the heading other documents. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (kah) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Larry Whitfield. (Livingston, Maxwell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Genuine Parts Company by Larry Whitfield. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3593955) (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Livingston, Maxwell) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Whitfield v. Genuine Parts Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Larry Whitfield | |
Represented By: | Maxwell C Livingston |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.