Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Rain Bar & Lounge LLC et al
| Joe Hand Promotions Inc |
| Rain Bar & Lounge LLC doing business as Rain Bar & Lounge and Rachele McGill |
| 2:2020cv01543 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 605 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. Rachele McGill served on 10/29/2020; Rain Bar & Lounge LLC served on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Janis, Ryan) |
| Summons Issued as to Rain Bar & Lounge LLC and Rachele McGill. (ds) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. (Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rachele McGill, Rain Bar & Lounge LLC by Joe Hand Promotions Inc. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3594409) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Janis, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
