Mark v. Jodar et al
| Jonathon M Mark |
| Kelly Jo Jodar and John and/or Jane Doe(s) |
| 2:2020cv01885 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 3/9/2021 at 10:30 AM by telephone before Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. The plaintiff is to appear by calling the court's conference line at 888-557-8511 and entering access code 4893665#. (cc: via mail to Jonathon Mark) (cb) Modified on 2/16/2021 (cb). |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jonathon M Mark. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
| Case Reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (amb) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (amb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jonathon M Mark. (amb) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jonathon M Mark. Jury Demand (amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
