Franklin v. Bowen et al
| Demon Franklin |
| Varnisha Bowen and CO Lake |
| 2:2021cv00139 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Demon Franklin. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from Plaintiff re re-mailing magistrate judge form ( consent form with #1 letter re-sent to plaintiff) (bx) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Demon Franklin. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from the Clerk to Demon Franklin regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (bx) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Demon Franklin. (bx) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Demon Franklin. (bx) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Demon Franklin. (bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
