Sarnowski v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Andrew T Sarnowski |
| Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| 2:2021cv00155 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/8/2021 GRANTING #7 plaintiff's second amended motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Andrew Sarnowski)(cb)
|
|
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENT by Andrew T Sarnowski re #1 Complaint - Social Security. (asc)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Andrew T Sarnowski. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(asc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/7/2021: #2 Letter re Living Expenses) (asc).
|
|
Docket Annotation: Received a call from plaintiff indicating he did not receive the 3/4/2021 Court Order #6 . Resent Order and blank form to him and told him if he needed more time to respond, he should file a letter with the court requesting it. (mlm)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 3/4/2021. By 3/26/2021, plaintiff to file second amended motion to proceed without prepaying filing fee. Failure to file by deadline will result in denial of motion and requirement that plaintiff pay full filing fee by date certain. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Andrew Sarnowski-with blank request form)(cb)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Andrew T Sarnowski. (asc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 2/10/2021. Plaintiff to file amended request to proceed without prepaying filing fee by end of day 3/12/2021; failure to file by deadline will result in denial of motion and requirement to pay full filing fee by date certain. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Andrew Sarnowski-with blank request to proceed without prepaying filing fee)(cb)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (blr)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Andrew T Sarnowski. (blr)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Andrew T Sarnowski.(blr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sarnowski v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew T Sarnowski | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
