Robinson v. Saul
| David Robinson |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv00238 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 3/11/2021. (blr)
|
|
Filing 10
Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/8/2021. (blr)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 3/4/21. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries for all further proceedings. Judge Lynn Adelman no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Transmit #1 Complaint and #6 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 2/26/21 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
|
Filing 5
Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 4/24/21; Plaintiff's brief due 6/3/21; Defendant's response due 7/13/21; Plaintiff's reply due 7/28/21. (cc: all counsel) (jad)
|
|
Filing 4
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by David Robinson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE Statement by David Robinson. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by David Robinson. (Duncan, Dana)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by David Robinson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Emily Skutch Cohn |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Dana W Duncan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
