Petersen v. Fuchs
Petitioner: Travis L Petersen
Respondent: Larry Fuchs
Case Number: 2:2021cv00245
Filed: February 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Larry Fuchs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (DeSantis, Nicholas)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (asc)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas DeSantis on behalf of Larry Fuchs. Attorney(s) appearing: Nicholas S. DeSantis (DeSantis, Nicholas)
March 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY DOJ as to Larry Fuchs (Collins, Winn)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RULE 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a copy of Petersen's petition and this order shall be served upon the respondent by service upon the State of Wisconsin Attorney General. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the respondent is directed to serve and file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition, complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases, within SIXTY (60) days of the date of this order. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(asc)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE from the clerk to RESPONDENT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (asc)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order FILING FEE Received: $5.00, receipt number 085612. (bx)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Travis L Petersen. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (tlf)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk to Travis L Petersen regarding the Prisoner E-Filing Program. (cc: All Counsel) (Attachments: #1 Prisoner E-Filing Information Packet)(tlf)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to Travis Petersen re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (mac)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Travis L Petersen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(mac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petersen v. Fuchs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Travis L Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Larry Fuchs
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Represented By: Nicholas DeSantis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?