Garmon v. Milwaukee County et al
D'Quailynn Garmon |
Milwaukee County Sheriff Office, Abraham Abu Dokuly and Milwaukee County |
2:2021cv00277 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 3/31/2021, waiving the initial partial filing fee for the plaintiff. On or before 4/30/2021 plaintiff shall notify the Clerk's Office if he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action to avoid the possibility of incurring a strike. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(mlm) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by D'Quailynn Garmon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(mlm) |
Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (mlm) |
Filing 3 PARTIAL Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by D'Quailynn Garmon. (mlm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by D'Quailynn Garmon. (mlm) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against Abraham Abu Dokuly, Milwaukee County, Milwaukee County Sheriff Office by D'Quailynn Garmon. (mlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.