Durley v. Tritt et al
Timothy Durley |
Kyle Tritt and Joseph Falke |
2:2021cv00281 |
March 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 4/27/2021. (cc: all counsel and mailed to Timothy Durley at Waupun Correctional Institution)(cb) |
|
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Timothy Durley. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (asc) |
INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE Received: $3.49, receipt number MK4689-085839. ; the payment of all future filing fees will be maintained by the financial department (bx) |
Filing 5 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (asc) |
Filing 6 LETTER re status of case from plaintiff. (asc) |
|
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Timothy Durley. (cmb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Timothy Durley. (cmb) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against All Defendants by Timothy Durley. (cmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.