Daniels et al v. Best Buy
Walter Fields, Sedgwick Daniels and Ericka Rush |
Best Buy |
2:2021cv00684 |
June 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Pamela Pepper |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Summons Issued as to Best Buy. (amb) |
Filing 6 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by All Plaintiffs (Townsel, Andre) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Townsel, Andre) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
Filing 4 ATTACHMENTS Civil Cover by Sedgwick Daniels, Walter Fields, Ericka Rush re #1 Complaint. (Townsel, Andre) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE Statement by Sedgwick Daniels, Walter Fields, Ericka Rush. (Townsel, Andre) |
Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Sedgwick Daniels, Walter Fields, Ericka Rush (Townsel, Andre) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Sedgwick Daniels, Ericka Rush, Walter Fields by Sedgwick Daniels, Ericka Rush, Walter Fields. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3834301)(Townsel, Andre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.