Hoier Everson v. Saul

Plaintiff: Nicole Hoier Everson
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv00716
Filed: June 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Stephen C Dries
Referring Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
June 28, 2021 Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/28/2021. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
June 25, 2021 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
June 23, 2021 Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 8/23/2021;Plaintiff's brief due 10/4/2021;Defendant's response due 11/15/2021;Plaintiff's reply due 11/30/2021. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
June 22, 2021 Filing 5 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 6/22/2021 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
June 22, 2021 Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
June 11, 2021 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nicole Hoier Everson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
June 11, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Nicole Hoier Everson. (Duncan, Dana)
June 11, 2021 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Nicole Hoier Everson. (Duncan, Dana)
June 11, 2021 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Nicole Hoier Everson (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
June 11, 2021 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (cmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoier Everson v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Emily Skutch Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Hoier Everson
Represented By: Dana W Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?