Negethon v. Nuss
Daniel Edward Negethon |
Honorable Richard Nuss |
2:2021cv00790 |
June 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Brett Ludwig |
Brett H Ludwig |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 8/09/21; this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim and the plaintiff shall recover nothing on the complaint (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(vkb) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 8/09/21 GRANTING #2 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee; DENYING as moot #6 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel; DENYING as moot #10 plaintiff's Motion for a 45-60 Day Extension of Time; FURTHER ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; ORDERING the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect the $350.00 balance of the filing fee (cc: all counsel and mailed to sheriff and pro se party)(vkb) |
Filing 10 MOTION for a 45-60 day Extension of Time to submit initial partial filing fee by Daniel Edward Negethon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(kmm) |
Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Daniel Edward Negethon. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (kah) |
Filing 8 LETTER from the clerk to Plaintiff requesting a new, completed consent/refusal form to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph be filed within 21 days. (kah) |
Filing 7 UNCHECKED Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Daniel Edward Negethon. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (kah) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel Edward Negethon. (kah) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Brett Ludwig on 6/25/21 that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 0.68 as an initial partial filing fee in this action (cc: all counsel and mailed to sheriff and pro se party)(vkb) |
Filing 4 LETTER from the clerk to Daniel Negethon re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. (lh) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Daniel Edward Negethon. (lh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Daniel Edward Negethon. (lh) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Honorable Richard Nuss by Daniel Edward Negethon. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Negethon v. Nuss | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Edward Negethon | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Honorable Richard Nuss | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.