Chapman et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Jeremy Chapman, Kemoy Fong and Paul Pilof |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 2:2021cv00794 |
| June 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Case transferred to Central District of California; Opened as case 2:21-cv-07083 on filed 09/02/2021 (bx) |
| Filing 9 Certified Order to Transfer Case to Central District of California on 9/2/2021.(cc: all counsel)(bx) |
| Case Electronically Transmitted to the Central District of California on 9/8/2021. (bx) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 9/29/2021 at 10:00 AM by telephone before Judge J P Stadtmueller. The court will initiate the call. No later than 12:00 PM the day prior to the hearing, counsel shall notify chambers at 414-297-1122 of the direct telephone number at which they may be reached. (cc: all counsel) (LD) |
| Case reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Ford Motor Company. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Rajkumar, Roshan) |
| NOTICE from the clerk to DEFENDANT requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 21 days; the form is available #here. (kah) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jeremy Chapman, Paul Pilof. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chester, Anthony) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE Statement by Ford Motor Company. (Rajkumar, Roshan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Roshan N Rajkumar on behalf of Ford Motor Company. Attorney(s) appearing: Roshan N. Rajkumar (Rajkumar, Roshan) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Rajkumar, Roshan) |
| SECOND NOTICE from the clerk to PLAINTIFFS requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 14 days; the form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (kah) |
| DISREGARD. DOCKETED IN ERROR. CASE NOT TERMINATED. Case Terminated pursuant to #3 Notice. (amb) Modified on 8/11/2021 (amb). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Kemoy Fong. (Chester, Anthony) |
| Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (amb) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Jeremy Chapman, Kemoy Fong, Paul Pilof (Chester, Anthony) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Jeremy Chapman, Paul Pilof, Kemoy Fong. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3854427)(Chester, Anthony) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/25/2021: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jcl). |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
