Newman v. Saul
| Emily M Newman |
| Andrew M Saul |
| 2:2021cv00800 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William E Duffin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; U.S. Attorney General served on 7/19/2021. (asc) |
| Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by September 10, 2021;Plaintiff's brief due October 20, 2021;Defendant's response due November 29, 2021;Plaintiff's reply due December 14, 2021. (cc: all counsel) (amb) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/9/2021. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew M Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/6/2021 GRANTING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Emily M Newman. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Emily M Newman. (Attachments: #1 Supplement to IFP petition - Letter from Dan Newman)(Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Emily M Newman. (Chewning, Donald) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Emily M Newman (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Appeals Council order, #3 Exhibit - ALJ Decision)(Chewning, Donald) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Newman v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M Saul | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Emily M Newman | |
| Represented By: | Donald J Chewning |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
