Ramirez v. Le Cabaret Inc et al
| Madea Ramirez |
| Le Cabaret, Inc., John A. Urban, Le Cabaret Inc doing business as Texas Jay's Gentlemen's Club Milwaukee and John A Urban |
| 2:2021cv00815 |
| July 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/2/2021. Upon consideration of #10 Defendants' unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file an answer or otherwise respond, the Court GRANTS the motion. Defendants have until 9/13/21 to file an answer or otherwise respond. No further extensions of time will be granted. (cc: all counsel) (cl)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (Richards, Mark) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark D Richards on behalf of All Defendants. Attorney(s) appearing: Mark D. Richards (Richards, Mark) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Madea Ramirez. Le Cabaret Inc served on 8/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service re Le Cabaret, Inc. dba Texas Jay's)(Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Madea Ramirez. John A Urban served on 8/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service re John A. Urban)(Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Madea Ramirez. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (bx) |
| Case reassigned to Judge J P Stadtmueller. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph no longer assigned to the case. (asc) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Madea Ramirez. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Kristensen, John) |
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (asc) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Madea Ramirez (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Madea Ramirez (Kristensen, John) |
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: One or more party names have been modified - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. The attached summons was not prepared using the version found on our website - please follow the instructions and resubmit the summons using the event Request for Issuance of Summons which is found under the heading other documents. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (asc) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (bx) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Madea Ramirez. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against All Defendants by Madea Ramirez. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3860883) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Madea Ramirez Consent Form, #3 Proposed Summons Le Cabaret, Inc., #4 Proposed Summons John A. Urban)(Kristensen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
