Baker v. Kohl's Corporation
STARLIGHT BAKER |
KOHL'S CORPORATION doing business as KOHL'S INC. and Kohl's Corporation doing business as Kohl's Inc |
2:2021cv00856 |
July 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Stephen C Dries |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE from the clerk to PLAINTIFF requesting that the Consent/Refusal form to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries be filed within 14 days; the form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (kah) |
Summons Issued as to Kohl's Corporation. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against KOHL'S CORPORATION by STARLIGHT BAKER. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3874063) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Miller, Matthew) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.