Ards v. Kijakazi
Elige Ards |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
2:2021cv00944 |
August 11, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
William E Duffin |
Pamela Pepper |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 DECLARATION and Return of Service Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; by Elige Ards. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (Brzezinski, James) Modified on 10/8/2021 (blr). |
Filing 8 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by November 30, 2021;Plaintiff's brief due January 10, 2022;Defendant's response due February 22, 2022;Plaintiff's reply due March 9, 2022. (cc: all counsel) (blr) |
Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/30/2021. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Elige Ards. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Brzezinski, James) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE Statement by Elige Ards. (Brzezinski, James) |
FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number 26T7DS8E. (cmb) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/12/2021. By 9/2/2021 plaintiff to file amended request to proceed without prepaying filing fee. Failure to file by deadline will result in denial of motion and requirement that plaintiff pay full filing fee. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Elige Ards. (Brzezinski, James) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Elige Ards (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brzezinski, James) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ards v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elige Ards | |
Represented By: | James M Brzezinski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.