Otis v. County/State the People et al
| Jill L Otis |
| County/State the People and Rebecken Sacgaw |
| 2:2021cv00956 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations filed by plaintiff Jill L Otis (vkb) |
| Docket Annotation: Phone call from plaintiff Jill L Otis stating she did not receive a copy of ECF No 4 Report and Recommendation. Copy remailed to her. PO Box address confirmed. (lz) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS re #1 Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 8/19/2021. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper. Judge Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(kah) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jill L Otis. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (asc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jill L Otis. (asc) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jill L Otis. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(asc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
