Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Jody Lynn Johnson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2021cv01073 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 10/8/2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to General L.R. 3.1(a)(2) and General L.R. 73.1, that this action is reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries for all further proceedings. (cc: all counsel)(blr)
|
|
Filing 7
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Jody Lynn Johnson. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Olinsky, Howard)
|
|
Filing 6
Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Commissioner of Social Security. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ESTABLISHING APPEAL PROCEDURE signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 9/17/21. Certified Administrative Record shall be filed and served on the plaintiff by 11/16/21; Plaintiff's brief is due by 12/27/21; Defendant's brief in response is due by 2/7/22; and Plaintiff may file a reply brief by 2/22/22. See Order for details. (cc: all counsel)(kwb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 9/16/2021 granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(kmm)
|
|
Transmit Complaint and Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF (asc)
|
|
Filing 3
DISCLOSURE Statement by Jody Lynn Johnson. (Olinsky, Howard)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Jody Lynn Johnson. (Olinsky, Howard)
|
|
Filing 1
SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Jody Lynn Johnson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard)
|
|
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Brett H Ludwig; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jody Lynn Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Howard D Olinsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
