Donahue v. TCC Wireless LLC
| Andrew Donahue |
| TCC Wireless, LLC and TCC Wireless LLC |
| 2:2021cv01123 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by TCC Wireless LLC - Waiver sent on 10/21/2021. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Donahue. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
| Summons Issued as to TCC Wireless LLC. (kah) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of Andrew Donahue. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi, James A. Walcheske, David M. Potteiger (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Andrew Donahue. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against TCC Wireless, LLC by Andrew Donahue. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3930997) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Andrew Donahue Consent to Join Form)(Luzi, Scott) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (cmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
