Gill v. Kedzierski et al
Charles B Gill, Sr |
Anna Kedzierski, Kevin Mauthe, Veronica Solecki and Katelyn Schueffner |
2:2021cv01154 |
October 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Lynn Adelman |
Pamela Pepper |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Charles B Gill, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(jcl) |
FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number MK4689-087764 (jcl) |
Filing 4 LETTER from petitioner regarding the filing fee (jcl) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Charles B Gill, Sr. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (jcl) |
Case randomly assigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. (vkb) |
Filing 2 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting payment of the full filing fee or that a petition to proceed without prepayment of the full filing fee and six-month certified trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (amb) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed against All Defendants by Charles B Gill, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.