Wiczek v. Gehl Foods LLC
| Terri Wiczek |
| Gehl Foods, LLC and Gehl Foods LLC |
| 2:2021cv01162 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Gehl Foods LLC - Waiver sent on 10/7/2021. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Summons Issued as to Gehl Foods LLC. (kah) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Terri Wiczek. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott S Luzi on behalf of Terri Wiczek. Attorney(s) appearing: Scott S. Luzi, James A. Walcheske, David M. Potteiger (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Terri Wiczek. (Luzi, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Gehl Foods, LLC by Terri Wiczek. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3941776) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Terri Wiczek Consent to Join Form)(Luzi, Scott) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Brett H Ludwig; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
