Rice v. Collective Entertainment Inc et al
Mark Rice |
Collective Entertainment Inc and Emily White |
2:2021cv01175 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
J P Stadtmueller |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Unopposed by Emily White. (Peters, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Emily White. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peters, Matthew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew W Peters on behalf of Emily White. Attorney(s) appearing: Matthew W. Peters (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peters, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kadie M Jelenchick on behalf of Emily White. Attorney(s) appearing: Kadie M. Jelenchick (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Jelenchick, Kadie) |
Filing 2 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (bx) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Mark Rice. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries. Jury (Filing Fee PAID ; 87661) (Service Packet Issued) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibits A, B, C)(bx) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.