Hallam v. Neenah Foundry Company
Plaintiff: Steven Hallam
Defendant: Neenah Foundry Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv01190
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Hallam. Neenah Foundry Company served on 12/3/2021. (Luzi, Scott)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE of Electronic Filing Error re #1 Complaint filed by Steven Hallam ; The description of the attachments contains duplicate text. Most documents on the drop-down list do not need further description. If you want to add a description, do not retype the same words into the description box. For example, if you choose Summons from the drop-down list then you may use the description box to the type in the name of the party to whom the summons is directed but you do not need to type the word summons. This document does not need to be re-filed; Please refer to the policies and procedures for electronic case filing and the user manual found at www.wied.uscourts.gov (lh)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Summons Issued as to Neenah Foundry Company. (lh)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge William C Griesbach; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (cmb)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James A Walcheske on behalf of Steven Hallam. Attorney(s) appearing: James A. Walcheske (Walcheske, James)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Steven Hallam. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Potteiger, David)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David M Potteiger on behalf of Steven Hallam. Attorney(s) appearing: David M. Potteiger (Potteiger, David)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Steven Hallam. (Potteiger, David)
October 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Neenah Foundry Company by Steven Hallam. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-3946840) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Potteiger, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hallam v. Neenah Foundry Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Hallam
Represented By: James A Walcheske
Represented By: David M Potteiger
Represented By: Scott S Luzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neenah Foundry Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?