Deheck v. Kijakazi
| Linda Deheck |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2021cv01191 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Kilolo Kijakazi. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian) |
| Filing 7 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Defendant to file and serve certified administrative record by 12/28/21;Plaintiff's brief due 2/6/22;Defendant's response due 3/18/22;Plaintiff's reply due 4/2/22. (cc: all counsel) (jad) |
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Linda Deheck. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Brzezinski, James) |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE Statement by Linda Deheck. (Brzezinski, James) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/29/21 granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Transmit #1 Complaint and #4 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Linda Deheck. (Brzezinski, James) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/25/21 that, on or before, November 1, 2021, plaintiff either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. (cc: all counsel)(jad)
|
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Linda Deheck (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brzezinski, James) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Lynn Adelman; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deheck v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Deheck | |
| Represented By: | James M Brzezinski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration |
| Represented By: | Brian E Pawlak |
| Represented By: | Emily Skutch Cohn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
