Mayweather v. Schmealing
| Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather |
| Christopher Schmealing |
| 2:2021cv01211 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by District Judge Lynn Adelman on 12/3/21 re #10 Letter from Plaintiff Regarding the Initial Partial Payment. The plaintiff says he does not have enough funds in his account to pay the $27.84 initial partial filing fee and requests "additional time to acquire the fees or assistance of some sort." He attached a trust account statement for October 2021, which shows an end balance of $0.00 in his regular account. But that statement, like the one he submitted on November 15, 2021, also shows several canteen and "Record Media" purchases. Although the plaintiff may decide how to spend the funds in his inmate account, the court need not waive the initial partial filing fee for a prisoner who chooses to spend his money on something other than his lawsuits. See Lindell v. McCaughtry, No. 01-C-209-C, 2004 WL 225074, *1 (W.D. Wis. Jan 23, 2004). I will GRANT the plaintiff's request for additional time to pay the initial partial filing fee. By February 4, 2022, he must pay the $27.84 initial partial filing fee or explain why he is not able to. (cc:all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
|
| Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather. (jcl) |
| Filing 10 LETTER from plaintiff Michael Mayweather regarding his initial partial payment (jcl) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER that on or before 12/8/21 plaintiff shall forward to the Clerk of Court the sum of $ 27.84 as an initial partial filing fee in this action signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 11/18/21. (cc:all counsel, warden and mailed to pro se party)(jad)
|
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather. (jcl) |
| Filing 7 LETTER requesting a complete six month trust account statement (jcl) |
| Filing 6 INCOMPLETE Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather. (jcl) Modified on 11/2/2021 (jcl). |
| Filing 5 LETTER from the clerk to plaintiff re Consent/Refusal to Magistrate Judge Joseph and requesting that the consent/refusal form be filed within 21 days. Also requesting that a six-month certified prisoner trust account statement be filed within 21 days. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mayweather v. Schmealing | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Ramon Thomas Mayweather | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Christopher Schmealing | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
