Collins v. Scullion et al
| Maurice Collins |
| Lt Scullion, CO Rabe and CO Hagensick |
| 2:2021cv01271 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Brett H Ludwig |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Brett H Ludwig on 11/30/21 that defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within 60 days of receiving electronic notice of this order and DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(MP) Modified on 12/1/2021 (vkb)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Maurice Collins. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (lh) |
| FILING FEE Received: $402.00, receipt number GB468900-5891. (lh) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from the Clerk to Maurice Collins requesting that he submit the consent/refusal form for Magistrate Judge William E Duffin within 21 days. Plaintiff must also submit either the filing fee or his request to proceed without prepayment and his six-month certified trust account statement. (tlf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Maurice Collins. (tlf) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT with jury demand filed against all Defendants by Maurice Collins. (tlf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
