Engel v. Twitter et al
Dylan Mathias Engel |
Twitter, Twitter Support, Lily Songh, DylanEngel91 and Unknown |
2:2021cv01321 |
November 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Stephen C Dries |
William C Griesbach |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by Deputy Clerk and approved by Judge William C Griesbach on 12/7/2021. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(cav) |
|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries on 11/19/2021. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed as frivolous and that judgment be entered accordingly. Case Reassigned to Judge William C Griesbach. Judge Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (cc: all counsel and mailed to pro se party)(amb) |
Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Dylan Mathias Engel. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (amb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Dylan Mathias Engel. (amb) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Dylan Mathias Engel. Consent forms distributed for Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Dries. Jury Demand. (amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.