Silva v. Hepp
| Alejandro Silva and Alejandro E Silva |
| Randall R Hepp |
| 2:2022cv00056 |
| January 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case reassigned to Judge Lynn Adelman. Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries no longer assigned to the case. (kah) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to file consent/refusal form by Alejandro E Silva. (Ruby, Cole) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Alejandro E Silva. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Ruby, Cole) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Alejandro Silva. ( Filing Fee PAID $5 receipt number AWIEDC-4019444) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil cover sheet)(Ruby, Cole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
