Rausch Sturm LLP v. Job
| Rausch Sturm, LLP and Rausch Sturm LLP |
| Kevin A. Job, Kevin-Arthur and Kevin A Job |
| 2:2022cv00077 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Stephen C Dries |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Rausch Sturm LLP. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Johnson, Alyssa) |
| Summons Issued as to Kevin A Job. (amb) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Rausch Sturm LLP (Johnson, Alyssa) |
| DISREGARD. DOCKETED IN WRONG CASE. Warrant for Arrest in Rem Issued. (amb) Modified on 1/24/2022 (amb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Kevin A. Job by Rausch Sturm, LLP. (Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4023052) (Attachments: #1 Envelope Exhibit A - UCC Financing Statement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Alyssa) Modified on 1/21/2022 (jcl). |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Stephen C Dries; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Dries to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
