Kafkas v. Raimondo
Plaintiff: Mr. Theodore Kafkas and Theodore Kafkas
Defendant: Department of Commerce and Gina Raimondo
Case Number: 2:2022cv00094
Filed: January 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Brett H Ludwig
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEF in Support filed by Gina Raimondo re #3 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to Comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 . (Larsen, Christian)
March 15, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to Comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 by Gina Raimondo. (Larsen, Christian)
January 26, 2022 Summons Issued as to Gina Raimondo. (kah)
January 26, 2022 Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: The county code has been modified - please remember to choose the county for the first named plaintiff. One or more party names have been modified - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (kah)
January 25, 2022 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Theodore Kafkas. (Shaw, James)
January 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Theodore Kafkas by Theodore Kafkas. ( Filing Fee PAID $402 receipt number AWIEDC-4025459) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)This document and/or certain attachments are restricted to case participants and attorneys of record should use their efiling login and password to view this document(Shaw, James) Modified on 1/25/2022 (asc).
January 25, 2022 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Brett H Ludwig; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available #here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kafkas v. Raimondo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Theodore Kafkas
Represented By: James R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theodore Kafkas
Represented By: James R Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Commerce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gina Raimondo
Represented By: Christian R Larsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?